Who is landing where, and what is already there

One neutral registry of planned landing sites, hardware still in use and historic sites, with the zones published around them. Every entry links to its source. A landing rocket blasts regolith across hundreds of metres or more, so a new site should be checked against all of them.

Planned site

Active asset

Heritage site

Recommended boundary

Check a planned landing

Enter a landing point and a lander size. The report lists every registry entry within plume-ejecta reach, whether each sits in the main ejecta sheet, below it or behind terrain, and the zones the landing falls inside, with low, central and high estimates.

South is negative

East-positive, −180 to 180

Lander size
SiteKindLocationZonesSensitive to
Artemis candidate region: de Gerlache Rim 2

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

88.1420°S 63.6620°W

region, ±17 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Haworth

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

86.6350°S 23.6720°W

region, ±25 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Malapert Massif

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

85.9250°S 1.2050°W

region, ±18 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Mons Mouton

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

85.4090°S 30.8370°E

region, ±14 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Mons Mouton Plateau

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

84.2910°S 27.4270°E

region, ±58 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Nobile Rim 1

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

85.4230°S 36.1900°E

region, ±17 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Nobile Rim 2

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

83.9760°S 57.9610°E

region, ±17 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Peak Near Cabeus B

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

83.5520°S 68.4160°W

region, ±17 km

none publishedHardware
Artemis candidate region: Slater Plain

NASA

One of NASA's nine candidate crewed landing regions (Oct 2024). NASA published names, not coordinates: the point is the centre we computed from the USGS region square and the circle reaches its corners. Artemis III is now an Earth-orbit test; NASA has not said whether these regions carry over to the first landing (Artemis IV).

Planned site

Candidate region

87.2560°S 125.2180°E

region, ±17 km

none publishedHardware
Blue Ghost Mission 2 (with Elytra Dark and ESA Lunar Pathfinder): Near Nassau crater, far side (target region; landing coordinates not published)

Firefly Aerospace

Planned site

Candidate region

24.9100°S 177.3400°E

region, ±38 km

none publishedHardware
Blue Moon Mark 1 Pathfinder ("Endurance"): Shackleton connecting ridge, south pole (target region; landing coordinates not published)

Blue Origin

Planned site

Candidate region

89.5000°S 135.2000°W

region, ±10 km

none publishedHardware
Griffin Mission One: Nobile crater region, near the south pole (target region; landing coordinates not published)

Voyager Technologies (formerly Astrobotic)

Planned site

Candidate region

85.2800°S 53.2700°E

region, ±40 km

none publishedHardware
IM-3 (Nova-C "Trinity"): Reiner Gamma lunar swirl, near the northern edge of its central bright oval (science target)

Intuitive Machines

Planned site

Landing target

7.5850°N 58.7250°W

published target

none publishedHardware
IM-4 (Nova-C): Mons Mouton, south pole (target region; landing coordinates not published)

Intuitive Machines

Planned site

Candidate region

84.6000°S 31.0000°E

region, ±65 km

none publishedHardware
How we knowwhere the entries and zones come from

Sites. Past landings and impact sites use the coordinates in Mission Watch's curated mission records, most of them measured in LROC images (Wagner et al. 2017). Planned sites are the targets operators have published; where only a named region is public, the point is its approximate centre and the dashed circle its size. Laser retroreflectors and candidate regions are curated separately with their own sources.

Zones. A zone is shown only when someone published it. NASA's 2011 recommendations ask visitors to target touchdown no closer than 2.0 km to U.S. Government lander sites and 500 m to U.S. impact sites, with visit boundaries around Apollo 11 and 17; they apply to U.S. Government artifacts only, so they are drawn only there. The Artemis Accords (Section 11) ask signatories to announce safety zones, but no operator has published one with coordinates yet, so the registry has none. When one is published, it is added here with its source.

Plume reach. The conflict check uses the engine's plume-ejecta model, with its sources and limits in docs/science/plume-ejecta.md. Reach is given as low, central and high estimates because published work spans a wide range.